Concurrent Semantics without the Notions of State or State Transitions
Edward A. Lee
in Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Modelling and Analysis of Timed Systems (FORMATS) Paris, (LNCS 4202, Springer-Verlag, E. Asarin and P. Bouyer, Eds.), September 25-27, 2006.
This paper argues that basing the semantics of concurrent
systems on the notions of state and state transitions is neither advisable
nor necessary. The tendency to do this is deeply rooted in our notions
of computation, but these roots have proved problematic in concurrent
software in general, where they have led to such poor programming practice
as threads. I review approaches (some of which have been around for
some time) to the semantics of concurrent programs that rely on neither
state nor state transitions. Specifically, these approaches rely on a broadened
notion of computation consisting of interacting components. The
semantics of a concurrent compositions of such components generally reduces
to a fixed point problem. Two families of fixed point problems have
emerged, one based on metric spaces and their generalizations, and the
other based on domain theories. The purpose of this paper is to argue for
these approaches over those based on transition systems, which require the notion of state.